Qualitive and Quantitive Matrix

Qualitive and Quantitive Matrix

Remove or Replace: Header Is Not Doc Title

Literature Review Research Matrix

Please note that the first row of data is meant as an example. Please read the example article (Garriott, Hudyma, Keene, & Santiago, 2015) as a guide for how to dissect each article assigned.

Reference Main Themes/Constructs Research Questions Theoretical Framework or Model Population & Sample description & “N=” Methodology and Design Summary of Findings
Garriott, P. O., Hudyma, A., Keene, C., & Santiago, D. (2015). Social cognitive predictors of first and non-first-generation college students’ academic and life satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 253–263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000066 Academic Progress, academic satisfaction, college outcome expectations, college life efficacy, environmental supports, life satisfaction, positive affect. What are the predictors of students’ academic and life satisfaction? Lent’s model of normative well-being. N=414

Students from two 4-year universities.

Quantitative, Quasi-Experimental, Multiple Measures.

This assessment consists of completing this provided  Literature Review Research Matrix [DOCX] . This matrix includes research concepts that can be found and connected to the published scholarly research provided by your instructor. Five research articles related to the topic of first-generation college students and resilience at a four-year university have been chosen for you. The articles for this assessment are posted in the Announcements area of the courseroom.

The first article (Garriott, Hudyma, Keene, & Santiago, 2015) is completed for you as an example; you will need to complete the matrix for the remaining four articles.

· Garriott, P. O., Hudyma, A., Keene, C., & Santiago, D. (2015).  Social cognitive predictors of first and non-first-generation college students’ academic and life satisfaction Journal of Counseling Psychology62(2), 253–263.

Additional Requirements

Additional articles needed to complete the Matrix.

· Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed). Sage. Available in the courseroom via the VitalSource Bookshelf link. (I was able to find this online for free)

. Chapter 1, “The Selection of a Research Approach,” pages 3–22.

. Chapter 2, “Review of the Literature,” pages 23–47.

. Chapter 3, “The Use of Theory,” pages 49–74.

· Winchester, C. L., & Salji, M. (2016).  Writing a literature review Journal of Clinical Urology, 9(5), 308–312.

· Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2017).  Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.

· Snyder, H. (2019).  Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Open chat
Hello
How can we help you?