Qualitive and Quantitive Matrix
Remove or Replace: Header Is Not Doc Title
Literature Review Research Matrix
Please note that the first row of data is meant as an example. Please read the example article (Garriott, Hudyma, Keene, & Santiago, 2015) as a guide for how to dissect each article assigned.
Reference | Main Themes/Constructs | Research Questions | Theoretical Framework or Model | Population & Sample description & “N=” | Methodology and Design | Summary of Findings |
Garriott, P. O., Hudyma, A., Keene, C., & Santiago, D. (2015). Social cognitive predictors of first and non-first-generation college students’ academic and life satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 253–263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000066 | Academic Progress, academic satisfaction, college outcome expectations, college life efficacy, environmental supports, life satisfaction, positive affect. | What are the predictors of students’ academic and life satisfaction? | Lent’s model of normative well-being. | N=414
Students from two 4-year universities. |
Quantitative, Quasi-Experimental, Multiple Measures. |
This assessment consists of completing this provided Literature Review Research Matrix [DOCX] . This matrix includes research concepts that can be found and connected to the published scholarly research provided by your instructor. Five research articles related to the topic of first-generation college students and resilience at a four-year university have been chosen for you. The articles for this assessment are posted in the Announcements area of the courseroom.
The first article (Garriott, Hudyma, Keene, & Santiago, 2015) is completed for you as an example; you will need to complete the matrix for the remaining four articles.
· Garriott, P. O., Hudyma, A., Keene, C., & Santiago, D. (2015). Social cognitive predictors of first and non-first-generation college students’ academic and life satisfaction . Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 253–263.
Additional Requirements
Additional articles needed to complete the Matrix.
· Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed). Sage. Available in the courseroom via the VitalSource Bookshelf link. (I was able to find this online for free)
. Chapter 1, “The Selection of a Research Approach,” pages 3–22.
. Chapter 2, “Review of the Literature,” pages 23–47.
. Chapter 3, “The Use of Theory,” pages 49–74.
· Winchester, C. L., & Salji, M. (2016). Writing a literature review . Journal of Clinical Urology, 9(5), 308–312.
· Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2017). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review . Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.
· Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines . Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.