IHP_501_Module_Seven_Activity_Guidelines_and_Rubric.html
Overview
A persuasive speech can be one of the most challenging types of presentation. For this type of presentation, you need to persuade someone to buy into your idea or approve your proposal. Your experience of composing a persuasive speech for this assignment will better prepare you to develop an effective poster presentation for your project. At the beginning of this course, you were presented with four potential humanitarian aid trip options that could be funded by the SNHU Humanitarian Aid Foundation. After reading the paper “ Aggressive and Violent Behavior Among Military Personnel Deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan: Prevalence and Link With Deployment and Combat Exposure,” you are inspired to propose a new trip to the stakeholders.
By investigating the scholarly literature, you will answer the questions: What type of trip does this systematic review and meta-analysis inspire? Since the paper is greater than five years old, does the current evidence suggest that these issues are still relevant? What unique health challenge do you believe is feasible as a focus for improvement? How are the elements of occupational health, environmental health, violence, and injury connected to this situation? How could they be improved if a humanitarian aid trip were performed in this scenario?
Prompt
Read the paper provided in the overview section. Your challenge is to persuade the foundation to adopt this issue as a potential humanitarian aid trip option. Begin your persuasive speech with a summary of what you are requesting. Be clear and concise about the purpose. Then, discuss how this trip addresses the elements of occupational health, environmental health, violence, and injury as presented in the module resources. Additionally, you should refrain from using the first person in order to maintain objectivity and professionalism in your presentation.
Note that you should cite at least three scholarly sources from your investigation. The evidence should not be older than five years. To access the Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing—Graduate, go to the Start Here section of the course.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
- Request Statement: Provide a clear, concise, and persuasive summary of your request statement.
- Explore the programs and resources published since systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Provide a brief summary of the trip you propose to address this situation, and briefly prepare the audience to hear your persuasive statement.
- Population: Describe the population in this scenario. Be sure to include all relevant characteristics for painting a meaningful, detailed picture for your audience.
- Health Challenges: Examine the unique health challenges facing this population.
- Occupational Health: Explain the occupational health issues in connection to this situation.
- Environmental Health: Analyze the environmental contamination issues that contribute to this situation.
- Violence and Injury: Explain how the elements of violence and injury are connected to this occupational exposure and environmental contamination.
- Conclusion: Summarize and restate the request based on the evidence provided in your speech.
Guidelines for Submission
Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. You must also include an APA-style title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.
| Criteria | Exemplary (100%) | Proficient (90%) | Needs Improvement (70%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Request Statement | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language | Provides a clear and concise summary of the request statement | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions | Does not attempt criterion | 15 |
| Population | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language | Describes the population in this scenario | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions | Does not attempt criterion | 10 |
| Health Challenges | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language | Examines the unique health challenges facing this population | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions | Does not attempt criterion | 10 |
| Occupational Health | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language | Explains the occupational health issues in connection to this situation | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions | Does not attempt criterion | 10 |
| Environmental Health | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language | Analyzes the environmental contamination issues that contribute to this situation | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions | Does not attempt criterion | 10 |
| Violence and Injury | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language | Explains how the elements of violence and injury are connected to this occupational exposure and environmental contamination | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions | Does not attempt criterion | 10 |
| Conclusion | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language | Summarizes and restates the request based on the evidence provided | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions | Does not attempt criterion | 10 |
| Articulation of Response | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner | Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, demonstrating an understanding of audience and purpose | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, negatively impacting readability | Submission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, preventing understanding of ideas | 10 |
| Scholarly Sources | Incorporates more than three scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources, or use of sources is exceptionally insightful | Incorporates three scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources that support claims | Incorporates fewer than three scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources, or not all sources support claims | Does not incorporate sources | 10 |
| APA Style | Formats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with no errors | Formats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with fewer than five errors | Formats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with five or more errors | Does not format in-text citations and reference list according to APA style | 5 |
| Total: | 100% |